This article is referring to the plan Obama is trying to put into action. They said that most people oppose this plan, but he's going with it anyway. Evidently, the people don't feel any safter either.
What the Obama adminsitration did is exactly what the NRA wanted--namely, Obama is allowing people to carry concealed weapons into National Parks. This is what people who favor gun control DO NOT want, but people who DO NOT favor gun control DO want. Most people oppose this plan because most people see a danger with allowing folks to carry concealed weapons into parks--there is obviously a danger to people camping or hiking, as well as the possibility of poaching or illegal hunting. I understand you are in favor of the idea that we should have fewer restrictions on guns; therefore you should be in favor of Obama's decision. Did I misread your blog and do I misunderstand your ideas? Are you in fact in favor of gun control? Please respond and let me know your ideas.
Well, I don't thik we should put more restrictions on guns themselves, but take more precaution to those who abuse the privilege of carrying a weapon. In my description I said that I was putting both sides of the controversial subject on here. I don't necessarily think gun control should exist, but this article referred to the people who still weren't satisfied with Obama's decision. Did I clear up any confusion you had?
Um, no not really. Are you or are you not in favor of this decision? if you favor no gun control, you should be for this. If you favor some gun control, you may or may not be in favor of this, for whatever reasons and depending on how much gun control you favor. If you favor tighter gun control, then you should not be in favor of this law. Remember to say how you feel about this issue and why.
Sorry, I do not favor gun control. I think that they should put more effort into people abusing the system and hurting others, along with themselves. So, I agree with this article.
What the Obama adminsitration did is exactly what the NRA wanted--namely, Obama is allowing people to carry concealed weapons into National Parks. This is what people who favor gun control DO NOT want, but people who DO NOT favor gun control DO want. Most people oppose this plan because most people see a danger with allowing folks to carry concealed weapons into parks--there is obviously a danger to people camping or hiking, as well as the possibility of poaching or illegal hunting. I understand you are in favor of the idea that we should have fewer restrictions on guns; therefore you should be in favor of Obama's decision. Did I misread your blog and do I misunderstand your ideas? Are you in fact in favor of gun control? Please respond and let me know your ideas.
ReplyDeleteWell, I don't thik we should put more restrictions on guns themselves, but take more precaution to those who abuse the privilege of carrying a weapon. In my description I said that I was putting both sides of the controversial subject on here. I don't necessarily think gun control should exist, but this article referred to the people who still weren't satisfied with Obama's decision. Did I clear up any confusion you had?
ReplyDeleteUm, no not really. Are you or are you not in favor of this decision? if you favor no gun control, you should be for this. If you favor some gun control, you may or may not be in favor of this, for whatever reasons and depending on how much gun control you favor. If you favor tighter gun control, then you should not be in favor of this law. Remember to say how you feel about this issue and why.
ReplyDeleteSorry, I do not favor gun control. I think that they should put more effort into people abusing the system and hurting others, along with themselves. So, I agree with this article.
ReplyDelete